Gaining Everything, Losing Something: The Question Women Are Finally Asking
Women fought for the right to an education and the right to run their own lives, and they won. None of that is in question here, and nothing in this essay wants any of it taken back. What deserves a second look is the story that came bundled with those victories. The victories and the story are not the same thing, and only one of them was written by women.
The story said that a woman's worth would be measured by how much paid work she could carry, and that the office was where she had to prove it. It left almost nothing in between. She could take the full-time job on the employer's terms, or she could step away from paid work altogether, and the culture had a name ready for whichever one she picked. Surveys running from the early 1970s through the mid-2000s show women's reported happiness sliding relative to men's during the same decades when their opportunities were expanding fastest.1 Families grew smaller and less stable across those same years, with fewer children in two-parent homes and marriages starting later.2 Now that employers are ordering everyone back to their desks five days a week, women are the ones walking out. The usual question is whether women can carry all of this. They can, and they have, for fifty years. The better question is who the arrangement was built to serve.
The Method Was Published in Advance
Edward Bernays, nephew of the pioneering psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, wrote the playbook. In 1928 he published a book called Propaganda, which describes the people who shape what the public wants as an "invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country."3 He was not warning his readers about these people. He was offering his services as one of them.
The following year he showed what that meant in practice. American Tobacco wanted to sell cigarettes to the half of the country that had been shamed out of smoking in public. Bernays consulted a psychoanalyst, who told him that cigarettes carried the symbolism of male power, and that a woman smoking in public could look like a claim to equality. Bernays built an event around that idea. His own secretary posed as an activist and wired invitations to New York debutantes, describing a demonstration for equality of the sexes. On Easter Sunday a small group of young women lit cigarettes as they walked down Fifth Avenue, and the photographers Bernays had hired were already in position when they did.4 Newspapers ran the story as spontaneous feminist defiance. Stuart Ewen later went back through the press records and found that the coverage adopted Bernays' framing without ever naming him or his client.5
I have written about this episode at length elsewhere, because it explains far more than the history of tobacco advertising.6 The frustration those women carried was real. They were not wrong to feel boxed in by the rules they were pushing against, and Bernays neither invented that feeling nor planted it. He found it, handed it a symbol, and stepped out of the frame. Ordinary advertising has to build a desire that was not there before. Bernays began with a desire that already existed and gave it a new place to go, which is why the women who acted on it experienced the whole thing as self-expression. They were sincere, and their sincerity was the reason he chose them.
Women's share of cigarette consumption had already risen from five percent in 1923 to twelve percent by the year of the parade, so the change was underway before Bernays touched it. What he added was a story and a symbol that the industry could keep selling for the next forty years. Find a real grievance, attach your product to it, and let the people you are selling to carry the argument on your behalf.
The Four Mechanisms
In The Hidden Hand I traced four mechanisms that elites have used to hold their position across five thousand years of recorded history. They are coercion, alignment, amnesia, and conflict.7 Coercion is the blunt one, meaning force or the believable threat of it, although in a wealthy economy it usually shows up as a bill rather than a fist. Alignment is the quiet coordination of separate institutions, which end up reinforcing one another without ever looking coordinated. Conflict keeps a population divided against itself and too busy fighting to look up at whoever profits from the fight. Amnesia may be the strongest of the four, because it clears the ground for the other three. A population that cannot remember what came before has nothing to measure the present against, so it inherits the current arrangement as though it were the weather.
The last sixty years of women's working lives fit all four.
Coercion: The Second Income Stopped Being Optional
Elizabeth Warren spent years inside bankruptcy records trying to work out why middle-class families were going broke, and what she and Amelia Warren Tyagi found did not match anything the culture was saying. A two-income family brings home 75 percent more than a one-income family did a generation earlier, and yet it has 25 percent less left over once the fixed bills are paid.8 The second paycheck didn't buy security. It went into a bidding war for houses in decent school districts, because every other family with a second paycheck was bidding too, and prices climbed until they matched what two earners could pay. After that, the second income was no longer something a woman chose. It was the price of admission, and the market set that price, not her.
Warren and Tyagi also show what the new arrangement quietly used up. The mother at home had been the family's reserve. If a husband lost his job or a parent fell ill, she could go earn money or she could go be a nurse, and the household absorbed the blow. When both adults are already working at full capacity, there is nothing left to call on. Their data shows that having a child is the single strongest predictor that a woman will end up in bankruptcy court.9 A freedom that hardens into an obligation has stopped being a freedom, and a family with two incomes and no reserve is more fragile than the family it replaced.
Alignment: Everyone Was Reading From the Same Page
Alignment is the mechanism people resist hardest, because it does not require anyone to sit in a room and plot. It only requires that separate institutions want compatible things and act on what they want. Employers wanted more workers. Advertisers wanted more households buying more appliances. Lenders wanted more borrowers. Not one of them had to phone the others.
Television did the cultural work without ever making an argument. Lynn Spigel documented how postwar programming sold suburban domestic life as an achievable ideal, one that happened to require a steady stream of purchases to reach.10 In my forthcoming book, I follow the same thread into the 1970s, when a wave of sympathetic television programs steadily dissolved the stigma around divorce. That shift was presented as personal liberation, and for many women trapped in miserable marriages it truly was. It also turned one household into two. Two rents, two sets of utilities, two cars, two of everything, and the money to cover it all had to come from somewhere. More women went to work. The consumer economy grew. Corporations gained access to a far larger pool of workers than they had ever had. An entire service industry grew up to do the domestic work those women were no longer home to do.11
None of those outcomes was anyone's stated goal. Every one of them arrived anyway. That is alignment working properly, and it is why looking for a smoking gun misses the point. There is no memo. There is a set of institutions whose interests pointed in the same direction, and a culture that gave the result a flattering name.
Amnesia: Nobody Remembers the Baseline
Ask a thirty-year-old woman today to imagine a household where one ordinary income covers a house, a car, and children, and she will hear it as a fairy tale or as a political provocation. She has no memory of such a thing. Her mother probably does not either. The arrangement she was born into looked like nature rather than like a decision somebody made, and that is precisely what amnesia is for.
The consequences are not abstract. With no baseline, a woman who is worn out has nothing to measure her exhaustion against except other women who are also worn out, so she concludes that the fault is hers. She is not organized enough. She has not found the right planner, or the right morning routine, or the right attitude. A whole industry sells her fixes for a problem she did not create and cannot solve on her own, because the problem does not live inside her. It lives in a housing market that repriced itself around two incomes, and in an employer who will not bend a schedule. Amnesia turns a structural condition into a personal failing. It is the reason so many capable women reach their forties privately convinced that they are the ones who dropped the ball.
Conflict: The Mommy Wars Were a Gift
For forty years American women have been invited to fight each other about all of this. Working mothers against mothers at home. Who is selfish, who is wasting her education, who is failing her children. The argument has consumed an enormous amount of intelligence and energy, and it has been carried on almost entirely between women, which should have been the first clue.
While that argument ran, housing prices climbed, wages flattened, and the employers who set the schedules were never once called to account in it. Conflict does not have to be invented to be useful. It only has to be kept going and pointed at the wrong target. A woman at home and a woman at a desk have far more in common with each other than either has with the company that will not offer either of them a serious part-time job. Nobody ever encouraged them to notice that.
What Women Actually Asked For
The most important fact in this story is also the one nobody repeats. Women said what they wanted, plainly and repeatedly, on the record, and nobody built it.
Pew has been putting the same question to mothers since 1997. Offered a choice between full-time work, part-time work, and no paid work, mothers have picked part-time every single time. It was 44 percent in 1997, then 50 percent in 2007, then 47 percent in 2012. Among mothers already working full-time, four in ten say part-time would be ideal, and only about two in ten would choose the arrangement they are actually in.12 Fathers answer in the opposite direction, with three quarters saying full-time work suits them.13 The labor market offers full-time or nothing. The option most mothers have named for nearly thirty years is the one that was never built.
Women did not have to be argued out of this preference. They stated it clearly, and the system had no interest in hearing it, because a workforce of full-time employees is worth more to an employer than a workforce of people who leave at two o'clock.
The birth rate shows the same pattern. It is usually discussed as a crisis for the pension system, as though women were a supply of future taxpayers running short. Set that framing down and look at the number itself. Americans still say the ideal family has about 2.7 children, while the actual birth rate has fallen to 1.6. Gallup has tracked the ideal for close to ninety years and finds that the gap between what people want and what they get is now wider than it has ever been.14 Surveys of women show the same thing. The number of children American women hope for has held steady at a little over two for decades.15 Nobody talked these women out of wanting children. The lives they were handed made those children too expensive, or made them too late. That is not liberation, and treating it as a demographic statistic hides whose loss it actually is.
The Cost to Women Themselves
Women are not imagining the weight of this. The American Psychological Association has been measuring it for years. In its 2023 national survey of more than three thousand adults, women reported an average stress level of 5.3 out of 10 against 4.8 for men, and nearly a third of women rated their stress at 8 or higher, compared with 21 percent of men.16 The 2025 survey found women again more likely than men to put themselves at the top of the scale.17 What matters most is not the score. It is what women name as the cause. They report being more disturbed by financial worries than men are, and they are more likely than men to rank family responsibilities as a major stressor. Sixty-eight percent said they had needed more emotional support over the past year to cope with stress about money, family obligations, and relationships.16 Money and family responsibility. Those are not hormones. Those are the two pressures this essay has spent its length describing, and women have been pointing straight at them.
Be careful with what follows, because it is easy to overstate and the overstatement would be false. Women still outlive men, and the recent widening of that gap is driven by rising male deaths of despair rather than by any improvement in women's health.18 This is not a story about women dying faster than men. It is a story about which women are dying, and it is a story about class.
Isaac Sasson, working from United States vital statistics, found that mortality in midlife rose for white women with twelve or fewer years of schooling, and that the education gap in adult life expectancy widened more than threefold for white women between 1990 and 2010 while roughly doubling for white men. By his conservative estimate, adult life expectancy among the least educated white women fell by 3.1 years across those two decades, against 0.6 years for men. Estimates drawn from national health survey data are starker still, showing a 3.2-year decline for those women and a 0.9-year gain for men over a similar span. Even the most cautious accounting reflects an excess of nearly 170,000 deaths among low-educated white women from rising mortality between 1990 and 2010.19 Anne Case and Angus Deaton confirmed the shape of it. Life expectancy between the ages of 25 and 75 is falling in America, and the fall is confined to people without a four-year degree, which holds for men and women and for Black and white alike.20
These are not old women. The Commonwealth Fund found that, setting COVID deaths aside, more than 16,000 additional women of reproductive age died in 2023 compared with 2010, and that nearly three-quarters of that increase came from drug-induced causes, meaning overdoses, suicides, homicides, and deaths left undetermined.21 Women in their twenties, thirties, and forties are dying of despair in numbers that grew by five figures in thirteen years.
Childbirth itself has become more dangerous here than anywhere else in the rich world. The United States ranks last among high-income countries in maternal mortality, with a ratio roughly triple that of Sweden, Japan, the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom, and France. Only 11 percent of maternal deaths occur on the day of delivery. Sixty-three percent occur during the first year after birth.22 Read that last figure against everything above. American women are not mostly dying in the delivery room. They are dying in the months afterward, in the exact window when this country expects a new mother to be back at a desk, and offers her almost nothing to make that survivable.
The women whose bodies are absorbing the worst of this are the women for whom the promise failed hardest. They are the ones who could not buy into the good school district, who got the obligation to work without any of the flexibility, and who were handed a two-earner requirement without a two-earner wage. They were told that going to work would make them safer. The vital statistics say otherwise.
The Cost to the Next Generation, Read Honestly
The share of children living with both married biological parents has dropped sharply, and births outside marriage have climbed from a few percent to nearly forty.23 Children in single-parent homes are roughly twice as likely to be poor. They finish high school and reach college at lower rates, and they show more behavioral problems along the way.24 Reported sadness and hopelessness among high school students have risen across the same span.25 Single-parent households are overrepresented among families relying on public assistance, and children raised in them climb the income ladder less often.26
Here is what the people who like to wave these numbers around tend to leave out. McLanahan and Sandefur, who did the most careful work on the question, concluded that low income and sudden drops in income are the main reason these children fall behind. They said plainly that poverty and school failure cannot be blamed on single parenthood by itself.27
Read closely, that finding sharpens the argument rather than blunting it. Money is the mechanism, and money is exactly what the second income was supposed to provide. A generation of women were told that going to work would make their families safer. The bankruptcy records show where the money actually went, which was into the price of the house, long before it ever reached the child. What is left is a family with less slack and less protection when something breaks. Blaming mothers for that is both cruel and lazy. They did what they were told would work. It did not work, and the reason has nothing to do with how hard they tried.
The Objection That Deserves an Answer
A woman who earns her own living can leave a man who is hurting her. That is not a small matter and it is not up for trade. Any argument that ends with women financially dependent on men who may or may not be decent to them is an argument that has already failed.
But watch how quickly that point gets used to end the conversation, and notice how little it actually answers. Being able to walk out the door is not the same as being required to work full-time on somebody else's clock. Independence was the promise. Rigidity was what got delivered. A system that genuinely cared about women's freedom would have built the flexible, well-paid, part-time work that mothers have been asking for since at least 1997, and it would have kept housing within reach of one income so that leaving was possible without a second job. Instead, it built mandatory attendance and a bidding war, and then it called the result a choice.
Women Are Already Refusing
The fight over returning to the office is where all four mechanisms surface at once, and women are the ones naming it. Researchers who tracked the employment histories of more than three million workers found that turnover at large firms rose about 14 percent after return-to-office mandates, and the effect landed hardest on women and on senior, highly skilled employees.28 Separate research on enforced office policies finds that taking away a person's say over where they work damages both their sense of meaning and their energy for the job.29 A 2024 survey found women far more likely than men to quit when ordered back full-time.30 These are not women rejecting work. They are women rejecting a schedule that was never designed around them and that has never been defended on its merits.
One number gets used against all of this, and it is worth meeting head-on. In 2019, 84 percent of mothers working full-time told Pew that their current situation was what was best for them at that point in their lives.31 Look at what the question actually asks. It asks a woman to judge the arrangement she is already living in, against alternatives that do not exist and that she has no reason to think are available to her. Of course she says it is best. It is the only thing on the menu. Ask those same women whether they would take a serious part-time job if one were genuinely on offer, and they have been answering yes for nearly thirty years.
The Map and the Doors
Bernays spelled the method out for anyone willing to read it. Find something people already want badly. Attach your product to it. Let them carry the argument for you, and let them believe the wanting was theirs from the start. It worked on Fifth Avenue in 1929 because the frustration was real, and it worked on a far larger scale afterward for exactly the same reason. The desire for a life of one's own was real. What got sold under that name was availability. Two earners to feed the housing market. Longer hours to feed the employer. Fewer children than she wanted. Less protection when the worst arrived. And a story polished enough that for fifty years it felt like winning.
The exhaustion is not a character flaw. Families are not smaller because women stopped caring. The children who were never born were wanted. The women dying in midlife are not dying of some private weakness. None of this shows that women failed at the arrangement. It shows that the arrangement was never built around anything women asked for, and the proof has been sitting in thirty years of survey data that nobody with the power to act on it has ever taken seriously.
Women pried those doors open with their own hands, and nobody handed them anything. What they were handed, free of charge, was the map for what to do once they were through. That map deserves the same hard look women gave the locks, and it deserves it now, while the fight over the office is still live and the ground is still moving. Women never needed anyone's permission to redraw it.
That redrawn map starts with one thing: women ending the war between themselves. The mommy wars, the working-mother wars, the who-is-sacrificing-more wars, every version of it has served the same purpose, which is to keep the argument aimed sideways while the people who benefit from the current arrangement never have to sit in the dock. The woman at the desk and the woman at home are not each other's problem. They are each other's evidence. One proves the arrangement is too rigid. The other proves it is too expensive. Together they are the same argument about a system that never built what either of them actually asked for. The moment they stop fighting each other and start saying that out loud in the same voice is the moment the argument becomes impossible to dismiss.
And that moment is closer than it has ever been. Women vote in higher numbers than men. They run companies, hold Senate seats, lead medical schools, and set cultural terms in ways that had no precedent a generation ago. They also have, for the first time, the data to name precisely what was taken and how the taking worked. The surveys are public. The mortality figures are public. The bankruptcy records are public. The Bernays archive is in the Library of Congress. The tools that built the invisible government are sitting in plain sight, and the women who know how to read them are more numerous and better positioned than at any point in the last hundred years.
The exhaustion is real. The losses are real. And so is the power. Women have broken harder things than this. They have every reason to break this one together.
Notes
1. Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1, no. 2 (2009): 190-225, https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.2.190.
2. Pew Research Center, "The American Family Today," December 17, 2015, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/12/17/1-the-american-family-today/.
3. Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda (New York: Horace Liveright, 1928), 9.
4. Larry Tye, The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and the Birth of Public Relations (New York: Crown Publishers, 1998), chap. 2.
5. Stuart Ewen, PR! A Social History of Spin (New York: Basic Books, 1996).
6. Eric Buesing, (forthcoming), chapter on Edward Bernays and the rise of modern propaganda.
7. Eric Daniel Buesing, The Hidden Hand: Wealth, Power, and Control from Pharaohs to Corporations (Walterville, OR: Trine Day, 2026).
8. Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Warren Tyagi, The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke (New York: Basic Books, 2003).
9. Warren and Tyagi, Two-Income Trap.
10. Lynn Spigel, Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
11. Buesing, (Forthcoming).
12. Pew Research Center, "Mothers and Work: What's 'Ideal'?," August 19, 2013, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2013/08/19/mothers-and-work-whats-ideal/.
13. Pew Research Center, "Chapter 1: Changing Views About Work," March 14, 2013, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/chapter-1-changing-views-about-work/.
14. Gallup, "Americans' Ideal Family Size Remains Above Two Children," September 4, 2025, https://news.gallup.com/poll/694640/americans-ideal-family-size-remains-above-two-children.aspx.
15. Institute for Family Studies, "Women Want More Children Than They're Having. America Can Do More to Help," August 15, 2024, https://ifstudies.org/blog/women-want-more-children-than-theyre-having-america-can-do-more-to-help.
16. American Psychological Association, "Women Say They're Stressed, Misunderstood, and Alone," November 1, 2023, https://www.apa.org/topics/stress/women-stress.
17. American Psychological Association, Stress in America 2025: A Crisis of Connection (November 2025), https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/stress-in-america/2025.
18. González-Velastín et al., "The Gender Gap in Life Expectancy in the United States and Deaths of Despair: Trends from 1979 to 2022," Population and Development Review (2025), https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.70028.
19. Isaac Sasson, "Diverging Trends in Cause-Specific Mortality and Life Years Lost by Educational Attainment: Evidence from United States Vital Statistics Data, 1990-2010," PLOS ONE 11, no. 10 (2016): e0163412, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163412.
20. Anne Case and Angus Deaton, "Life Expectancy in Adulthood Is Falling for Those without a BA Degree, but as Educational Gaps Have Widened, Racial Gaps Have Narrowed," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 11 (2021): e2024777118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024777118.
21. Commonwealth Fund, "Maternal Mortality in the United States, 2025," July 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2025/jul/maternal-mortality-united-states-2025.
22. Commonwealth Fund, "Maternal Mortality in the United States, 2025."
23. U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Tables on Family Structure and Poverty, https://www.census.gov; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Vital Statistics System, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/index.htm.
24. U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Tables on Family Structure and Poverty; Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur, Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Youth Risk Behavior Survey, https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/index.html.
26. Administration for Children and Families, Child Support Enforcement Program Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, https://www.acf.hhs.gov; Raj Chetty, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez, "Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States," Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, no. 4 (2014): 1553-1623.
27. McLanahan and Sandefur, Growing Up with a Single Parent.
28. Yuye Ding, Zhao Jin, Mark (Shuai) Ma, Betty (Bin) Xing, and Yucheng (John) Yang, "Return-to-Office Mandates and Brain Drain" (working paper, SSRN, 2024), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5031481.
29. Clinton et al., "Enforced but Not Enacted: How Return-to-Office Policies Reshape Boundary Enactment, Work-Location Volition, and Eudaimonic Wellbeing," Human Resource Management (advance online publication, 2026): 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.70080.
30. Resume Builder, Survey on Return-to-Office Mandates and Employee Turnover (2024), https://www.resumebuilder.com.
31. Pew Research Center, "Despite Challenges at Home and Work, Most Working Moms and Dads Say Being Employed Is What's Best for Them," September 12, 2019, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/09/12/despite-challenges-at-home-and-work-most-working-moms-and-dads-say-being-employed-is-whats-best-for-them/.
Bibliography
Administration for Children and Families. Child Support Enforcement Program Statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov.
American Psychological Association. Stress in America 2025: A Crisis of Connection. November 2025. https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/stress-in-america/2025.
American Psychological Association. "Women Say They're Stressed, Misunderstood, and Alone." November 1, 2023. https://www.apa.org/topics/stress/women-stress.
Bernays, Edward L. Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright, 1928.
Buesing, Eric Daniel. The Hidden Hand: Wealth, Power, and Control from Pharaohs to Corporations. Walterville, OR: Trine Day, 2026.
Case, Anne, and Angus Deaton. "Life Expectancy in Adulthood Is Falling for Those without a BA Degree, but as Educational Gaps Have Widened, Racial Gaps Have Narrowed." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 11 (2021): e2024777118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024777118.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/index.htm.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Survey. https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/index.html.
Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez. "Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States." Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, no. 4 (2014): 1553-1623.
Clinton, et al. "Enforced but Not Enacted: How Return-to-Office Policies Reshape Boundary Enactment, Work-Location Volition, and Eudaimonic Wellbeing." Human Resource Management, advance online publication, 2026, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.70080.
Commonwealth Fund. "Maternal Mortality in the United States, 2025." July 2025. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2025/jul/maternal-mortality-united-states-2025.
Ding, Yuye, Zhao Jin, Mark (Shuai) Ma, Betty (Bin) Xing, and Yucheng (John) Yang. "Return-to-Office Mandates and Brain Drain." Working paper, SSRN, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5031481.
Ewen, Stuart. PR! A Social History of Spin. New York: Basic Books, 1996.
Gallup. "Americans' Ideal Family Size Remains Above Two Children." September 4, 2025. https://news.gallup.com/poll/694640/americans-ideal-family-size-remains-above-two-children.aspx.
González-Velastín, et al. "The Gender Gap in Life Expectancy in the United States and Deaths of Despair: Trends from 1979 to 2022." Population and Development Review, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.70028.
Institute for Family Studies. "Women Want More Children Than They're Having. America Can Do More to Help." August 15, 2024. https://ifstudies.org/blog/women-want-more-children-than-theyre-having-america-can-do-more-to-help.
McLanahan, Sara, and Gary Sandefur. Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Pew Research Center. "Chapter 1: Changing Views About Work." March 14, 2013. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/chapter-1-changing-views-about-work/.
Pew Research Center. "Despite Challenges at Home and Work, Most Working Moms and Dads Say Being Employed Is What's Best for Them." September 12, 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/09/12/despite-challenges-at-home-and-work-most-working-moms-and-dads-say-being-employed-is-whats-best-for-them/.
Pew Research Center. "Mothers and Work: What's 'Ideal'?" August 19, 2013. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2013/08/19/mothers-and-work-whats-ideal/.
Pew Research Center. "The American Family Today." December 17, 2015. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/12/17/1-the-american-family-today/.
Resume Builder. Survey on Return-to-Office Mandates and Employee Turnover. 2024. https://www.resumebuilder.com.
Sasson, Isaac. "Diverging Trends in Cause-Specific Mortality and Life Years Lost by Educational Attainment: Evidence from United States Vital Statistics Data, 1990-2010." PLOS ONE 11, no. 10 (2016): e0163412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163412.
Spigel, Lynn. Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Stevenson, Betsey, and Justin Wolfers. "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness." American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1, no. 2 (2009): 190-225. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.2.190.
Tye, Larry. The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and the Birth of Public Relations. New York: Crown Publishers, 1998.
U.S. Census Bureau. Historical Tables on Family Structure and Poverty. https://www.census.gov.
Warren, Elizabeth, and Amelia Warren Tyagi. The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke. New York: Basic Books, 2003.